Hi *,

I am in the situation where 1.6 would be preferred (and that's why I
expressed my positive feeling on switching to JDK6): for Digester 3 I
had to revert the initial import of the Annotations Processor, because
still using Java5 com.sun.* APT APIs - not present at least in our
Continuum JVM - but if switching to Java6 to use javax APIs, older
users that didn't update their JVMs, could not get benefits from
eventual bufixes.

Any suggestion? TIA!!!
all the best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/



On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:20 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 February 2012 15:18, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 10/02/2012 14:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> In many cases the differences between Java 5 and 6 aren't noticeable.
>>> If the project doesn't require anything from Java 6, why require it?
>>> I'm sure there are quite a few places where it is still being used
>>> despite the end of support.
>>
>> I think there are several reasons:
>> - It strikes me as odd to release a new version of a component - such as
>> pool2 - targeting a version of the JVM that is already effectively obsolete.
>
> So are you saying that if we release a new version of commons-logging
> it should require Java 1.6?
> That would be completely unnecessary.
>
>> - There are some platforms (I am thinking primarily of OSX) where
>> getting ones hands on a Java 5 implementation requires a fair amount of
>> jumping through hoops. [1]
>
> But surely Eclipse can be told to target Java 1.5 ? That would at
> least deal with the compiler warnings.
>
>> - Pool2 feeds dbcp2 and Java6 includes JDBC4 which is not backwards
>> compatible with JDBC3. DBCP is already jumping through hoops with
>> 1.3/1.4 and targeting Java6 makes DBCP easier
>
> I don't see how problems with JDBC are relevant to Pool.
>
>> - Something we have seen in Tomcat is JVM bugs not being fixed in older
>> releases. The fewer older JVM versions we target, the less likely we are
>> to hit these sorts of bugs. Granted, I haven't seen any of this in
>> Commons. Yet.
>
>> Some of these arguments are pool2 specific but overall, my preference is
>> for targeting the lowest currently supported version of the JVM unless
>> there is a compelling argument not to.
>
> Java 1.5 *is* still supported.
>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> [1] I happened to be using my Mac to work on pool 2 and noticed a whole
>> bunch of @Override warnings because my Mac doesn't have a Java 5 (mainly
>> because after the latest OS upgrade I couldn't be bothered to jump
>> through the hoops yet again(,
>>
>>
>>>
>>> In short, if the project needs features found only in Java 6 then
>>> make it the minimum, otherwise support Java 5.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2012, at 5:51 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> [pool2] just went from Java 5 to Java 6 because Java 5 requires
>>>> paid-for support from Oracle.
>>>>
>>>> How does the ML feel about moving projects that are now on Java 5
>>>> to Java 6?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you, Gary
>>>>
>>>> -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in
>>>> Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring
>>>> Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home:
>>>> http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to