On 02/06/2012 05:16 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
I don't, but since its there, so be it.
OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current
behaviour should be fixed and documented or just documented.
You mean with DAEMON-240?
Yes.
Resolved just about now.
Having --foo and ++foo on the same command line will cause
procrun to exit with error.
Well, that resolves the problem, but might cause some scripts to
break, so should be highlighted in the release notes.
Hmm, right. I'll revert the patch. There should be no surprises
or new features with 1.0.x branch.
Think that --foo=a ++foo=b ++foo=c should behave like
If there was foo set, set to a b c, not add a b c.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
