On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: > On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I don't, but since its there, so be it. >>> >> >> OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current >> behaviour should be fixed and documented or just documented. >> > > You mean with DAEMON-240?
Yes. > Resolved just about now. > Having --foo and ++foo on the same command line will cause > procrun to exit with error. Well, that resolves the problem, but might cause some scripts to break, so should be highlighted in the release notes. > >> I'm happy to do the doc updates once the decision is made. >> > > I did some update, but feel free to double check. Still need to clarify how --Option and ++Option behave with respect to existing settings, but I can do that shortly. > > Regards > -- > ^TM > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
