On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote:
On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> wrote:
I don't, but since its there, so be it.
OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current
behaviour should be fixed and documented or just documented.
You mean with DAEMON-240? Resolved just about now.
Having --foo and ++foo on the same command line will cause
procrun to exit with error.
I'm happy to do the doc updates once the decision is made.
I did some update, but feel free to double check.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
