+1

thanks,

Luc

Le 01/02/2012 07:05, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
> +1 too Oliver, great work!
> 
> -Simo
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Oliver Heger
>> <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gary,
>>>
>>> Am 30.01.2012 22:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>
>>>  Hi Oliver:
>>>>
>>>> These header issues are not real blockers (hence my -0). I was hoping to
>>>> nudge you into fixing these but I also know that cutting another RC can be
>>>> a pain.
>>>>
>>>> My POV is that consistency is important. Why make people spend time
>>>> figuring out if RAT warnings are valid or not, especially when the fix is
>>>> trivial? With 0 RAT warnings, I can move on to the next item down the
>>>> check
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> I would be happy if these header issues were all fixed in trunk such that
>>>> the next release would pick them up. I do not think that "it was already
>>>> broken" is a good reason to skip a task ;)
>>>>
>>>> Then I could +1 this release with the comfort that the next release would
>>>> have the 'fixes'.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>
>>> point taken, and it turned out that it was really good to look at these
>>> issues:
>>> - The css file was obviously not needed, maybe it was a relict from the
>>> maven 1 build. I removed it.
>>> - A license header was added to PROPOSAL.html.
>>> - I am afraid, I currently cannot solve the issue with the plist file. The
>>> parser for plist files in [configuration] cannot deal with comments. I
>>> created [CONFIGURATION-477] for this purpose (to be fixed in a later
>>> release). So this is the only file the RAT report complains about.
>>>
>>
>> Very nice! Thank you. Voila: +1.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>> <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>**wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Simone and Gary,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for reviewing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding the missing license headers:
>>>>> - project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
>>>>> header in such cases.
>>>>> - test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I
>>>>> would
>>>>> add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format for plist
>>>>> files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go without headers
>>>>> as
>>>>> they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
>>>>> - PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a
>>>>> header.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
>>>>> since the last release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
>>>>> I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
>>>>> compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of
>>>>> Commons
>>>>> Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception is the
>>>>> dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only which is
>>>>> deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something in this
>>>>> area.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>>>>
>>>>>  -0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like a couple of missing headers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For me, I see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to
>>>>>> update
>>>>>> the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another
>>>>>> RC
>>>>>> is made.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tested with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
>>>>>> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\****bin\..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>>>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
>>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>>>>> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
>>>>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org>****wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hello Oliver,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am for getting [configuration] released
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  * binaries checksums+gpg are OK
>>>>>>>  * clirr report is OK
>>>>>>>  * checkstyle is OK
>>>>>>>  * findbugs is OK
>>>>>>>  * project build OK
>>>>>>>  * mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
>>>>>>> not sure this is blocking
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unapproved licenses:
>>>>>>>  PROPOSAL.html
>>>>>>>  src/site/xdoc/style/project.****css
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  src/test/resources/test.plist
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the
>>>>>>> best!
>>>>>>> -Simo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**simonetripodi/>
>>>>>>> <http://people.**apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://simonetripodi.**livejou**rnal.com/ <http://livejournal.com/><
>>>>>>> http://**simonetripodi.livejournal.com/<http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/>
>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/****simonetripodi<http://twitter.com/**simonetripodi>
>>>>>>> <http://twitter.**com/simonetripodi <http://twitter.com/simonetripodi>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>>>>> <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>   wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
>>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>>> release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
>>>>>>>> language
>>>>>>>> features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  This
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tag:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/****asf/commons/proper/**<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/commons/proper/**>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> configuration/tags/****CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://**
>>>>>>> svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**commons/proper/configuration/**
>>>>>>> tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Binaries:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>>>> <h**ttp://people.apache.org/%**7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/>
>>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**maven/>
>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Site:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/****site/<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**site/>
>>>>>>>> <http://people.apache.**org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.**8rc1/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~****oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**<http://people.apache.org/%7E**oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/**>
>>>>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES.txt<http://**people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/**
>>>>>>>> configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-**NOTES.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eoheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>>>>>>>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>>>>>>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>>>>> <dev-unsubscribe@**commons.apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  ------------------------------****----------------------------**--**
>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>>>>>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>>>> <dev-unsubscribe@**commons.apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------**
>>>>> --**---------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>>>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apac**he.org<http://apache.org>
>>>>> <dev-unsubscribe@**commons.apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
>>> dev-unsubscribe@commons.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
>> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to