Hi Simone and Gary,
thanks for reviewing.
Regarding the missing license headers:
- project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required to have a
header in such cases.
- test.plist is a test configuration file used by some unit tests. I
would add a header, but I don't know what would be the correct format
for plist files. OTOH, I assume that simple test files can also go
without headers as they really do not contain any intellectual properties.
- PROPOSAL.html is around since the very beginning and never had a header.
Please take into account that the affected files have not been changed
since the last release.
Regarding dependencies to other commons components:
I think we updated all dependencies possible without breaking binary
compatibility (for instance, the public API exposes some classes of
Commons Lang, therefore we could not update to Lang 3.0). An exception
is the dependency to Digester, but this is used by a single class only
which is deprecated. So there is no big motivation to change something
in this area.
Could I convince you to a +1 vote ;-)
Oliver
Am 30.01.2012 19:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
-0
Looks like a couple of missing headers.
For me, I see:
Unapproved licenses:
src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
src/test/resources/test.plist
I see no complaint about PROPOSAL.html which IS missing a header.
Now that the component requires Java 5, it seems like a good time to update
the deps too, not critical for 1.8, but should be considered if another RC
is made.
Tested with:
Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\bin\..
Java version: 1.6.0_29, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_29\jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
Gary
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Simone Tripodi
<simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote:
Hello Oliver,
I am for getting [configuration] released
* binaries checksums+gpg are OK
* clirr report is OK
* checkstyle is OK
* findbugs is OK
* project build OK
* mvn artifacts look having right metadata (Implementation-Build)
there is the RAT report that shows that there are 3 Unknown Licenses -
not sure this is blocking
Unapproved licenses:
PROPOSAL.html
src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
src/test/resources/test.plist
Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
<oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
Hi all,
this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the first
release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new language
features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK version).
This
could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_8RC1
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/maven/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/site/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.8rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Vote will remain open for 72 hours.
Thanks!
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
