good point :) let me investigate, thanks for the feedbacks!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/11 12:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Good morning guys, >> I just did an experiment on my local checkout of the parent pom, >> adding the buildnumber plugin, in order to have a new >> `Implementation-Build` manifest entry in the jars, where reported the >> revision number and the timestamp. >> I applied locally on [chain] and got: >> >> Implementation-Build: r1166864; 2011-09-09 09:17:22+0200 > > Is there any way to either suppress the entry or get a tag name put > in place of the revision number when we cut releases? I guess what > you end up with is the revision number of the winning RC tag in > release jars. Are we sure we want to do that? > > Phil >> >> I'd like to commit it if no one has objections, if needed I can fill >> an Issue and attach the patch. >> Please let me know, thanks in advance! >> Have a nice day, >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
