good point :)
let me investigate, thanks for the feedbacks!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/9/11 12:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Good morning guys,
>> I just did an experiment on my local checkout of the parent pom,
>> adding the buildnumber plugin, in order to have a new
>> `Implementation-Build` manifest entry in the jars, where reported the
>> revision number and the timestamp.
>> I applied locally on [chain] and got:
>>
>>     Implementation-Build: r1166864; 2011-09-09 09:17:22+0200
>
> Is there any way to either suppress the entry or get a tag name put
> in place of the revision number when we cut releases?  I guess what
> you end up with is the revision number of the winning RC tag in
> release jars.  Are we sure we want to do that?
>
> Phil
>>
>> I'd like to commit it if no one has objections, if needed I can fill
>> an Issue and attach the patch.
>> Please let me know, thanks in advance!
>> Have a nice day,
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to