Hi GUI code is out of scope IMO.
Gary On Jul 7, 2011, at 17:17, Marko Klopcic <markok3...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It is probably a bit late, but it is only these days I've checked > javadoc of the commons-lang ver. 3 on the web, and found contexted > exceptions. I found the context info useful already some time ago, so > I've implemented my own classes, which you can find at > > http://www.trimah.com/eng/index.php/tools-for-developers/2-java-exceptions > > I'm ready to share my experience and also to help with implementation. > It is also no problem to change the license of my code to Apache License. > > I'd suggest to add interface for Exception formatter, and one or two > implementations (I have only impl. KEFormatter). If formatter > is separate from exception implementation, it is easier to use it > also with standard Java exceptions. I also find > YAML format very readable and parsers for it already exist. > > I also have one question - is it OK to add a GUI class to the > lang library? I have implementation of an exception dialog, which > has two panes - upper one for text messages and context info, bottom > one for stack info, when the user presses 'Details button'. I also > plan to add 'Copy' button so users can easily copy-paste error info > to mail when asking for help. > Context info and stack trace have helped me many times! > > Greetings, > > Marko Klopcic > > > > > > On 07/07/2011 12:53 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: >> On 7 July 2011 11:48, Jörg Schaible<joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: >>> One last opinion about the output? Originally we had e.g.: >>> >>> [Handler = PersonConverter] >>> [Current Element = Person] >>> [Role = COO] >>> [Handler[1] = CompanyConverter] >>> [Current Element[1] = Company] >>> >>> The current output does no longer have the "[1]" numbering at the keys. >>> However, I wonder if the plain output sequence is now enough for easy >>> analysis, whether I should add those indexes again (for the formatted >>> message only) or should add an additional element numbering e.g. like: >>> >>> [1:Handler = PersonConverter] >>> [2:Current Element = Person] >>> [3:Role = COO] >>> [4:Handler = CompanyConverter] >>> [5:Current Element = Company] >> >> The default message should probably have numbering as per [1:Handler >> = PersonConverter] >> Stephen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
