Stephen Colebourne wrote: > On 7 July 2011 11:48, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: >> One last opinion about the output? Originally we had e.g.: >> >> [Handler = PersonConverter] >> [Current Element = Person] >> [Role = COO] >> [Handler[1] = CompanyConverter] >> [Current Element[1] = Company] >> >> The current output does no longer have the "[1]" numbering at the keys. >> However, I wonder if the plain output sequence is now enough for easy >> analysis, whether I should add those indexes again (for the formatted >> message only) or should add an additional element numbering e.g. like: >> >> [1:Handler = PersonConverter] >> [2:Current Element = Person] >> [3:Role = COO] >> [4:Handler = CompanyConverter] >> [5:Current Element = Company] > > The default message should probably have numbering as per [1:Handler > = PersonConverter] > Stephen
Done. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
