On 7 July 2011 11:48, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@scalaris.com> wrote: > One last opinion about the output? Originally we had e.g.: > > [Handler = PersonConverter] > [Current Element = Person] > [Role = COO] > [Handler[1] = CompanyConverter] > [Current Element[1] = Company] > > The current output does no longer have the "[1]" numbering at the keys. > However, I wonder if the plain output sequence is now enough for easy > analysis, whether I should add those indexes again (for the formatted > message only) or should add an additional element numbering e.g. like: > > [1:Handler = PersonConverter] > [2:Current Element = Person] > [3:Role = COO] > [4:Handler = CompanyConverter] > [5:Current Element = Company]
The default message should probably have numbering as per [1:Handler = PersonConverter] Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org