Le 15/05/2011 10:30, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
+1
From me, too.
OK, it's done now. I have put everything as subpackages of geometry as
suggested by Phil, and I have taken care to use the proper new
exceptions as suggested by Gilles.
I could simply remove the bsp directory from sandbox now, but I think it
is a little more complicated, as we need to remove the component from
various lists (in the sandbox page, in Jira ...). Whate is the proper
procedure for this ?
Luc
Den 14/05/2011 11.08 skrev "Luc Maisonobe"<luc.maison...@free.fr>:
Hello,
Some weeks ago, I have imported in the sandbox a new component, Apache
Commons BSP which implements Binary Partitioning Trees (see the thread
about this creation here:<http://markmail.org/thread/mcg23trgtl472ica>).
Thinking further about it, I would like to directly merge it into
[math]. We are creating a new major release for [math], so it may be a
good time to do so. Also as I changed the code to put it in sandbox, in
fact I already did all the necessary work to have a working
implementation, with tests and clean reports from checkstyle and
findbugs. The implementation is complete for dimensions 1, 2 and 3 in
Cartesian space. I also need an implementation on spherical geometry but
I can do that regardless of the component hosting this package. So the
component could be promoted and it really makes sense to have it inside
[math].
It could be put as a bsp package at top level (alongside with geometry,
analysis, ode ...).
Does this suggestion makes sense ?
Luc
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
