Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> [snip] >> * One last nit - why did we decide to dump the Ant build. Version >> 2.6 seems to have a working Ant build. Why wouldn't the same build >> work for 3.0. If you are OK with this, I will try to get the Ant >> build restored. > > IIRC, because no one was maintaining it. I've dumped other Ant builds > in other components too over the last 4 years (along with maven1 > builds). I'm generally -1 to the "there are many ways to build it" > approach. It takes the pain of dealing with one build system and > increases it to 3x the pain. [manage build1, manage build2 and then > ensure build1 and build2 stay in sync]. Same here. Why deliver two build scripts .. is anybody actually keen on ensuring that both builds generate the same stuff? What do we vote on then? - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
