On 8 November 2010 04:14, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:03 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I just checked, and the tag agrees with the source archive - apart >> from the sandbox tree, which is only in the tag. >> > > Huh? If you look at the tag that is supposed to be for 1.0 here: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/vfs/tags/vfs-1.0/ > > It contains a pom.xml file in the "root" directory. If you download > an unzip/untar the source distributions from here: > > http://commons.apache.org/vfs/download_vfs.cgi > > they do not. How do they agree? Am I looking in the wrong place?
Sorry, I overlooked the top-level pom.xml in all the other differences (sandbox). So there was a packaging error. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
