On Nov 7, 2010, at 6:32 PM, James Carman wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: >> >> That said, I understand the implications of screwing stuff up. I just think >> it is a lot less likely that you will find 2.0 and 1.0 of VFS in the same >> classpath vs something like commons lang. But if the consensus is to change >> the package names before doing a release it can certainly be done. Note >> that I raised this question in August 2009 when we first discussed changing >> the JDK version to Java 5 (see the thread I referenced for that in the >> previous VOTE thread). I'm just a little miffed that I could have done this >> a year ago. >> > > I can understand why you would be miffed. Do you remember the first > person who replied to you in that thread and the first question out of > their mouth > (http://www.mail-archive.com/u...@commons.apache.org/msg03711.html)? > Please review the discussion. These issues were addressed. >
Yeah. I should just get over it and go do it. Rereading the thread it is clear more people than not thought the package name should be changed. I'll take the blame for not doing it. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
