Hi James, James Carman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: >> >> Do you really consider this to be a -1? I consider this to be a >> documentation issue. User's can pick and choose which providers they >> want and simply need to be aware that Net 2.0 requires 1.5. >> > > The providers are auto-registered based on what's on the classpath. > So, if they added net 2.0 to their classpath, that provider would be > registered. It may not be completely obvious that net 2.0 requires > 1.5+. This is not the point. If they add net 2.0 to the classpath they are using Java 5 probably anyway. The interesting quesiton is, what happens if net 1.4 is on the classpath? I'd guess the provider is also auto-registered, but will crash at some point ... > I agree this is probably just a documentation issue. Don't > know if it should be a blocker. If the application will crash, just because net 1.4 is on the classpath, it is a blocker. If an application can run as logn as it does not use the stuff requiring net 2.0, it's unfortunate, but documentation is enough. _ Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
