Hi Rahul, don't worry I won't publish the site before the release; about the Menu reorganization I like the b) too, it is much more coherent with previous releases. Thanks a lot, have a nice day, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi all, Rahul, >> what about the latest deployed website? > <snip/> > > Looks good overall, though I haven't taken a fine-toothed comb to it. > > >> Can I proceed modifying the >> homepage in order to propose a release? > <snap/> > > Sure, but please don't deploy it after those changes until the release > is done. Before posting the vote, the site is previewed w/ the rc > profile (-Prc) in the site-deploy command -- this will deploy the site > to the pao/commons/builds area where the other artifacts for the vote > will get posted as well. > > WRT the new additions to the LHS menu, currently we have (indentation > implies nesting): > > Developers Guide (SVN latest) > Core APIs > Plugins > Substitution > XML Rules > Annotations > FAQ > > I see two options for the 2.1 release: > > (a) Use the above (but change SVN latest to 2.1) > > (b) Use the following: > > Release 2.1 (Current) > Guide > Core APIs > Plugins > Substitution > XML Rules > Annotations > FAQ > Javadoc > Release Notes > > Release 2.0 > ... (current content for 2.0 menu) > > > I think (b) will work better as it aligns with menu for previous > releases -- note the FAQ indentation in (b) BTW as its different -- > WDYT? > > -Rahul > > >> Thanks in advance, all the best, >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Rahul, >>>> thanks a lot for your feedbacks, actions have been completed following >>>> your suggestions. >>>> my final 2 questions: >>>> - I didn't find any reference on wiki about >>>> ${commons.deployment.protocol}... can we have a private chat? >>> <snip/> >>> >>> Sure, though it helps to have things in the list archives for the next >>> person in line, so the responses are best when archived :-) >>> >>> The deployment protocol bit is for wagon and defaults to scp (see >>> parent pom). If you want to use some other (for example, scpexe with >>> PuTTY), then it can be changed via an active profile in >>> ~/.m2/settings.xml. If you've used the m2 release plugin before, you >>> probably don't need to do anything new for Commons. >>> >>> >>>> - Is it the case to migrate the group id to org.apache.commons? >>> <snap/> >>> >>> No, not for 2.1 (archives have this topic at length). >>> >>> -Rahul >>> >>> >>>> Many thanks in advance, namaste >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org