Yeah, i hope some one can work with me for the project together, i will supply anything that you need as i can :-)
在 2010年9月5日 下午10:19，Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>写道： > 2010/9/5 Xun Long Gui <ustbco...@gmail.com>: > > Yeah, I will add this part, but i think it will take me a while, i will > > graduate this winter, these days, i was working for my graduate pater, so > > may be you should wait for a while, sorry for that :-( > > > <snip/> > > The other option always available would be for someone else to jump in > and make the necessary changes. I may not have time soon for this, but > Jake or Chris if you want to take a look, feel free to have at it. > > Starting point to get going is probably this page [1]. > > -Rahul > > [1] > http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/guide/run-source-code.html > > > > > 2010/9/5 Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca> > > > >> Hi Long, > >> > >> I just wanted to follow up quickly and find out the current status on > the > >> issues that were raised here. Specifically, is it possible to add > >> executable > >> content to transitions in scxml-eclipse? > >> > >> Please let me know. Thanks, > >> > >> Jake > >> > >> 2010/8/8 Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca> > >> > >> > Hi Long, > >> > > >> > I should mention that I had missed this part of the specification as > >> > well, and I only recently discovered it while trying to determine how > >> > best to express static reactions with SCXML. I'm currently updating > >> > scxml-js to support this. > >> > > >> > Jake > >> > > >> > On 10-08-08 10:12 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote: > >> > > Hi Jake, > >> > > Thanks for your reply. It seems that we should re-define transition > EMF > >> > data > >> > > model for this tool, rebuild the tool from the base. I will read > SCXML > >> > > transition specification carefully and carry on the rebuild job > >> > > > >> > > 在 2010年8月9日 上午9:22，Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca>写道： > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> Hi, Long, > >> > >> > >> > >> Replies below: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target > is > >> a > >> > >>> necessary element for a transition. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >> The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not > required. > >> > >> In that case, I think the semantics are similar to a Static > Reaction, > >> as > >> > >> defined in the paper describing the Rhapsody semantics of > statecharts. > >> > >> From the spec: > >> > >> > >> > >> The identifier(s) of the state or parallel region to transition to. > If > >> > >> it is omitted, the transition will not cause a change in the state > >> > >> configuration when it is executed. The executable content contained > in > >> > >> the transition will still be executed, so the transition will > function > >> > >> as a simple event handler. If the target is present and equal to > the > >> > >> state containing the transition element, the transition will cause > the > >> > >> state machine to leave and then re-enter this state. > >> > >> > >> > >> From: http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#transition > >> > >> > >> > >>> To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them, not a > >> big > >> > >>> thing. What do you mean about "showstoppers" bug ? > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >> What I mean is that I think these things are critical to usability. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jake > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Best Regards Gui Xun Long (桂训龙)
