2010/9/5 Xun Long Gui <ustbco...@gmail.com>: > Yeah, I will add this part, but i think it will take me a while, i will > graduate this winter, these days, i was working for my graduate pater, so > may be you should wait for a while, sorry for that :-( > <snip/>
The other option always available would be for someone else to jump in and make the necessary changes. I may not have time soon for this, but Jake or Chris if you want to take a look, feel free to have at it. Starting point to get going is probably this page [1]. -Rahul [1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/guide/run-source-code.html > 2010/9/5 Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca> > >> Hi Long, >> >> I just wanted to follow up quickly and find out the current status on the >> issues that were raised here. Specifically, is it possible to add >> executable >> content to transitions in scxml-eclipse? >> >> Please let me know. Thanks, >> >> Jake >> >> 2010/8/8 Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca> >> >> > Hi Long, >> > >> > I should mention that I had missed this part of the specification as >> > well, and I only recently discovered it while trying to determine how >> > best to express static reactions with SCXML. I'm currently updating >> > scxml-js to support this. >> > >> > Jake >> > >> > On 10-08-08 10:12 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote: >> > > Hi Jake, >> > > Thanks for your reply. It seems that we should re-define transition EMF >> > data >> > > model for this tool, rebuild the tool from the base. I will read SCXML >> > > transition specification carefully and carry on the rebuild job >> > > >> > > 在 2010年8月9日 上午9:22，Jacob Beard <jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca>写道： >> > > >> > > >> > >> Hi, Long, >> > >> >> > >> Replies below: >> > >> >> > >> On 10-08-08 09:06 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> I do not think we can create a transition without a target, target is >> a >> > >>> necessary element for a transition. >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> The spec says that the target attribute on transition is not required. >> > >> In that case, I think the semantics are similar to a Static Reaction, >> as >> > >> defined in the paper describing the Rhapsody semantics of statecharts. >> > >> From the spec: >> > >> >> > >> The identifier(s) of the state or parallel region to transition to. If >> > >> it is omitted, the transition will not cause a change in the state >> > >> configuration when it is executed. The executable content contained in >> > >> the transition will still be executed, so the transition will function >> > >> as a simple event handler. If the target is present and equal to the >> > >> state containing the transition element, the transition will cause the >> > >> state machine to leave and then re-enter this state. >> > >> >> > >> From: http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#transition >> > >> >> > >>> To feature 1 and 3 in Chris's commends, we can achieve them, not a >> big >> > >>> thing. What do you mean about "showstoppers" bug ? >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> What I mean is that I think these things are critical to usability. >> > >> >> > >> Jake >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
