On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:38 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30/06/2010, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Here are example tarballs, jar and a site for a 3.0 beta: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta/ > > Is this basically the same code as in commons-lang-trunk?
Yes - exactly the same. >> The site isn't intended to be ready - that can be done later. What it >> does right now is provide the relevant 3.0 reports. >> >> What I'd like to know right now is if it looks good and whether I >> should go ahead and tag 3.0-beta and do a real release build. I think >> we're ready to build a beta. I don't expect a lot of API change after >> this, and I don't know of any bugs in 3.0 that weren't in 2.x. >> >> So not a release vote, but looking for consensus from anyone (users, >> committers, pmc) that it's time to put a beta stake in the ground. > > In general I agree. > > However, I think it is essential to document the intended class thread-safety. > > For example, the mutable package is not intended to be thread-safe > whereas concurrent is presumably intended to be. If you want to do that, then I can see delaying for a defined time. If it's just something you think someone else should do, I know it isn't my priority and not something I'd see as a release blocker for either a beta or for 3.0 itself. > The package.html files also need some work. They're pretty tiny, so shouldn't be much [unless you have visions of writing a lot in there]. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
