On 30/06/2010, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here are example tarballs, jar and a site for a 3.0 beta: > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-3.0-beta/
Is this basically the same code as in commons-lang-trunk? > The site isn't intended to be ready - that can be done later. What it > does right now is provide the relevant 3.0 reports. > > What I'd like to know right now is if it looks good and whether I > should go ahead and tag 3.0-beta and do a real release build. I think > we're ready to build a beta. I don't expect a lot of API change after > this, and I don't know of any bugs in 3.0 that weren't in 2.x. > > So not a release vote, but looking for consensus from anyone (users, > committers, pmc) that it's time to put a beta stake in the ground. In general I agree. However, I think it is essential to document the intended class thread-safety. For example, the mutable package is not intended to be thread-safe whereas concurrent is presumably intended to be. The package.html files also need some work. > Hen > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Honton, Charles wrote: > > > >> Be it alpha, beta, or full release: when is a version 3 of commons-lang > >> going to be available? > > > > It's probably this year. > > > > - Jörg > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
