On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Gary Gregory<ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 2:38 AM >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3 >> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary >> Gregory<ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] >> >> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM >> >> To: Commons Developers List >> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3 >> >> >> >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> > I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the >> >> > feedback from the first. >> >> > >> >> > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3 >> >> > [ ] -1 No, because... >> >> > >> >> > The tag for RC3 is here: >> >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC3/ >> >> > >> >> > The release artefacts are here >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/ >> >> > >> >> > Site is available here: >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/ >> >> > (note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to >> >> > proper codec home) >> >> > >> >> > RAT Report: >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/rat-report.html >> >> > >> >> > CLIRR Report: >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/clirr-report.html >> >> > >> >> > Release Notes: >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/changes- >> report.html >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> >> > >> >> > Thanks >> >> > >> >> > Niall >> >> > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Sigs and hashes are good and both ant and maven builds work fine on jdk >> >> 1.4-1.6. >> >> >> >> I see there are 2 issues open with fix version = 1.4 and 3 more that >> are >> >> uncategorized. >> > >> > I can see that [CODEC-73] is worth fixing and not too hard. I'll take a >> cut at updating the proposed patches to the current code base. >> >> Can this go in the next release or do you want to cancel this RC/vote >> one and include it in the 1.4 release? > > I think there are other small issues that have added up that warrant another > RC.
What are these? Because I only see the DigestUtils commit since RC3 was created. > WRT to this ticket in particular, it is partially addressed by the > DigestUtils fixes I have put in. I am happy to leave the rest for the next > release though. > How about just going with whats in RC3 as the release? Niall > Gary > >> >> Niall >> >> > Gary >> > >> >> >> >> I am +1 on this release assuming the open issues can be assigned to a >> >> later release. >> >> >> >> Are all of the files in the top-level directory of the source >> >> distribution necessary, still-maintainted, and relevant? >> >> >> >> Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
