On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary Gregory<ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3 >> >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >> > I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the >> > feedback from the first. >> > >> > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3 >> > [ ] -1 No, because... >> > >> > The tag for RC3 is here: >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC3/ >> > >> > The release artefacts are here >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/ >> > >> > Site is available here: >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/ >> > (note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to >> > proper codec home) >> > >> > RAT Report: >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/rat-report.html >> > >> > CLIRR Report: >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/clirr-report.html >> > >> > Release Notes: >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/changes-report.html >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Niall >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> > >> Sigs and hashes are good and both ant and maven builds work fine on jdk >> 1.4-1.6. >> >> I see there are 2 issues open with fix version = 1.4 and 3 more that are >> uncategorized. > > I can see that [CODEC-73] is worth fixing and not too hard. I'll take a cut > at updating the proposed patches to the current code base.
Can this go in the next release or do you want to cancel this RC/vote one and include it in the 1.4 release? Niall > Gary > >> >> I am +1 on this release assuming the open issues can be assigned to a >> later release. >> >> Are all of the files in the top-level directory of the source >> distribution necessary, still-maintainted, and relevant? >> >> Phil >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
