> -----Original Message----- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 2:38 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3 > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary > Gregory<ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM > >> To: Commons Developers List > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3 > >> > >> Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> > I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the > >> > feedback from the first. > >> > > >> > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3 > >> > [ ] -1 No, because... > >> > > >> > The tag for RC3 is here: > >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC3/ > >> > > >> > The release artefacts are here > >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/ > >> > > >> > Site is available here: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/ > >> > (note: some links are relative and will be broken until deployed to > >> > proper codec home) > >> > > >> > RAT Report: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/rat-report.html > >> > > >> > CLIRR Report: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/clirr-report.html > >> > > >> > Release Notes: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/site/changes- > report.html > >> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc3/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > Niall > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> Sigs and hashes are good and both ant and maven builds work fine on jdk > >> 1.4-1.6. > >> > >> I see there are 2 issues open with fix version = 1.4 and 3 more that > are > >> uncategorized. > > > > I can see that [CODEC-73] is worth fixing and not too hard. I'll take a > cut at updating the proposed patches to the current code base. > > Can this go in the next release or do you want to cancel this RC/vote > one and include it in the 1.4 release?
I think there are other small issues that have added up that warrant another RC. WRT to this ticket in particular, it is partially addressed by the DigestUtils fixes I have put in. I am happy to leave the rest for the next release though. Gary > > Niall > > > Gary > > > >> > >> I am +1 on this release assuming the open issues can be assigned to a > >> later release. > >> > >> Are all of the files in the top-level directory of the source > >> distribution necessary, still-maintainted, and relevant? > >> > >> Phil > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
