On 27/06/2009, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:41 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So one cannot unambiguously use the tag to refer to the source that > > was used for the build. > > > Vote accepted => Release tag > > Vote denied => RC# tag > > Sorry, but I fail to see a problem.
AIUI, the GA tag is created before the vote. If the vote fails, the tag has to be deleted and recreated for the next vote. I.e. the tag is not enough to identify the source of what was voted on. Whereas if one uses a tag with RCn in the name, one can create RC1, RC2, RC3 etc if the votes fail; whichever RCn succeeds can then be copied to the GA tag, which is therefore not changed once created. > Jochen > > > > -- > > Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
