Hi. > Given that there *are* incompatibilities, I am +1 on the package renaming. > >> Should we change the top level package name from org.apache.commons.math to >> org.apache.commons.math2 ? >>
I don't understand why version 2.0 should be assimilated to a new project. Is there someone who is going to work on the v1.2 code base? If not, what is the gain? Anyone who has an application that runs under v1.2 can still use the old JAR, which will be forever compatible. As it has been said, upgrading to a new major release may involve incompatible changes. Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
