Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Sam Halliday a écrit :
I don't want to hold up a 2.0 release... however it would be a shame to
release an API that would restrict further inclusion of MTJ/BLAS, especially
in the sparse API. Would it be possible to hold back the linear algebra
updates for now?
If you'd really like to get 2.0 out as it stands, then can I be involved in
an API review to minimise any future problems? This might involve some API
changes from today's snapshot (although, no extra features or anything heavy
like that).
Of course you can look at the API and comment on it or suggest changes.
If they are wise and can be implemented quickly, we'll probably do it.
If you want some changes to be included, your best bet is to explain
them on the list and to provide patches for that using JIRA.
++1 - by all means, now is the time to comment on / suggest changes to
the 2.0 API.
Phil
I agree... this is far too big a task for 2.0!
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
However, as both Phil and I have said, we still want to have 2.0 out
very soon. Adding a complete BLAS API is a huge task so I really prefer
to wait after 2.0. We can discuss about it here, of course. You could
also open a JIRA issue for requesting the enhancement, targeting 2.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
