Sam Halliday a écrit : > I don't want to hold up a 2.0 release... however it would be a shame to > release an API that would restrict further inclusion of MTJ/BLAS, especially > in the sparse API. Would it be possible to hold back the linear algebra > updates for now? > > If you'd really like to get 2.0 out as it stands, then can I be involved in > an API review to minimise any future problems? This might involve some API > changes from today's snapshot (although, no extra features or anything heavy > like that).
Of course you can look at the API and comment on it or suggest changes. If they are wise and can be implemented quickly, we'll probably do it. If you want some changes to be included, your best bet is to explain them on the list and to provide patches for that using JIRA. > > I agree... this is far too big a task for 2.0! > > > Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> However, as both Phil and I have said, we still want to have 2.0 out >> very soon. Adding a complete BLAS API is a huge task so I really prefer >> to wait after 2.0. We can discuss about it here, of course. You could >> also open a JIRA issue for requesting the enhancement, targeting 2.1. >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
