On 12/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Yes, I know; the original instructions (shown as outdated, at the > >> > bottom) imply that it is possible; seems to me it would be a lot > >> > better. > >> > >> > >> No its not outdated - just the last paragraph is outdated by the above > writings: > > > > That's what I meant - the last para is marked as outdated. > > > ah forgive, I should read better.... yes you are right. sorry. > > > >> I don't know where the problem is, but according to Jörgs e-mail I > >> would say we can ignore for now. Just saw your PM with the properties, > >> I guess there is no need to answer any more > > > > No, but if you could apply the property changes that would be good - > > or let me know and I can check out the code on people.a.o and do it > > there. > > > Wouldn't it be better to do this at trunk? Didn't Jörg say this isn't > necessary? > When doing a new RC i check out the trunk again new and fresh. I think > it would be better to have changes there instead of patching the RC? > Or did I miss something, sorry for aksing dumb. >
Sorry, that's what I meant - fix the files in SVN trunk, and they will be included in any new tags. > Cheers > Christian > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org