>> jRPM has updated the license themself after i requested it. >> See: >> http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jrpm/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=25&view=markup > > I see. > > That's actually the AL header, rather than the AL 2.0 License. > > The web-site still has: > > http://jrpm.sourceforge.net/maven-reports.html > which has the license link: > http://jrpm.sourceforge.net/license.html
Yes, the project is quite silent. I guess they didn't update the website after they updated the license for us. > >> "Original CPIO classes contributed by Markus Kuss and the jRPM project >> (jrpm.sourceforge.net)" > > Yes, that's good, except it should probably also include whatever > copyright statement was in the original code, perhaps "Copyright 2003 > jRPM Team" which is what the AL header above has. OK. After that is done - are there more issues with the license or do you think we can re-roll? > I'll try and fix the test failure and manifest entries in case we need > to re-roll the release. That would be cool - I will help tomorrow morning either with rerolling or with fixing the issues you brought up. Cheers Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
