Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > On Apr 11, 2009, at 6:20 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> >> >> Actually I'd be against SLF4J. Additionally I also prefer commons- >> logging >> compared to j.u.l. >> > Why would you be against SLF4J? I assume that means if I changed it to > use SLF4J you would vote -1 on the code commit? Does that apply to > any commons project? the point is, what do we gain by a change to SLF4J? For simple components like the ones in Apache Commons it is enough to have one logging facade. There was a major effort to resolve any problem with CL 1.1.1. Most of its bad reputation was a result of Tomcat using CL itself. Tomcat is using JUL now and I really bet SLF4J would suffer from the same problems if used as base of a JEE server. Additionally, since you can use SLF4J as direct replacement, every user is free to do so. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
