On 2009-03-03, Wolfgang Glas <wolfgang.g...@ev-i.at> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig schrieb: >> On 2009-03-03, Wolfgang Glas <wolfgang.g...@ev-i.at> wrote:
>>> Stefan Bodewig schrieb: >>>> On 2009-03-02, Wolfgang Glas <wolfgang.g...@ev-i.at> wrote: >>> Acccording to my tests WinZip recognizes the EFS flag upon >>> reading. >> Then my documenation is wrong 8-) > Sorry for not exactly reading the Documentation, No problem, will fix it. >>> Secondly, if you set the encoding to UTF-8, there's no need for >>> unicode extra fields anyway. >> Except when your client doesnt recognize the EFS flag and thinks you'd >> be using CP437 - but happily accepts the Unicode extra fields. I >> thought this would be the case for WinZIP. > Yes, the EFS flag is of little usefulness. It has been added very > late to Specs and most implementation ignore it right away. IIUC it is detected by PKWARE, 7Zip and WinZIP, commons-compress - and InfoZIP's unzip as well as Ant if the version is recent enough. Not too bad. >> You vastly overestimate the effort it takes to write an Ant task. > That nice, however, I hope that I can avoid adding ant to the list > of OS-project I participate in ;-) You already contributed to it, thanks. >> createUnicodeExtraFields = NEVER (default) | ALWAYS | NOT_ENCODABLE >> useLanguageEncodingFlag = true (default) | false >> fallbackToUtf8 = true | false > Agreed ;-) > The implementation should be be straightforward, shall I prepare a > patch or can you afford doing it at your own? Will do it myself. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org