On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 to your suggestion, with the addition of adding ASL 1.1 to the >> LICENSE file if it's ASL 1.1 rather than AL 2.0. > > The license file says ASL 1.1: > http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jrpm/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=2&view=markup > > Some files are explicit AL 2.0: > http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jrpm/trunk/src/java/com/jguild/jrpm/io/RPMFile.java?view=markup > > The files in question have this header: > /* > * jGuild Project: jRPM > * Released under the Apache License ( http://www.apache.org/LICENSE ) > */ > > I don't want to be picky, but having that kind of header means the > desired files are licensed AL 2.0 right?
That url doesn't point directly to either of our licenses though. It's not the one we put in our src header. It might be an old ASL 1.1 one. It's entirely possible here that ymenager's code is ASL 1.1 and mkuss' code is AL 2.0. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
