On 20/06/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/20/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Gump nag messages are currently sent from lots of different mail > > addresses, all of which have to be subscribed (or allowed to post) to > > the dev list. > > > > I think we should just use: > > > > Gump <general AT gump.apache.org> > > > > for them all. > > > > <snip/> > > Makes sense to me. Or even: > > Gump <issues AT commons.a.o> > > so any replies to sender are noticed on our lists.
Good idea; I'll set that up. > > -Rahul > > > > > This would avoid any problems if the real person from whom the mail is > > supposed to come decides to unsubscribe from the list. > > > > Any reasons to keep the (historical) from settings? > > > > All the nags are sent to the dev address. > > [If some nags were to be sent to outside addresses, then a specific > > from address might be necessary] > > > > S/// > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
