On 20/06/2008, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:46 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Gump nag messages are currently sent from lots of different mail > > addresses, all of which have to be subscribed (or allowed to post) to > > the dev list. > > > > IIRC (not a sure thing ;) it was set up this way so that the Gump team knows > who to nag when something breaks and doesn't get fixed.
Good point. > These days, I seem > to only see Gump nags when the whole lot fails for some reason, so I'm not > sure how useful having the individual names is any more. Yes, for Commons that's not all that important. Also, the from addresses have not been updated as far as I can tell; some senders are not now particularly active (if at all) in Commons. > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > > I think we should just use: > > > > Gump <general AT gump.apache.org> > > > > for them all. > > > > This would avoid any problems if the real person from whom the mail is > > supposed to come decides to unsubscribe from the list. > > > > Any reasons to keep the (historical) from settings? > > > > All the nags are sent to the dev address. > > [If some nags were to be sent to outside addresses, then a specific > > from address might be necessary] > > > > S/// > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
