Sure, you can just add them directly yourself if you like.
Rory

The *nix short date formatting fixes don't currently have any tests,
at least when I last checked.

I think these need to be added first.

I can add some later today if that's OK with you?
Or do you want them done as patches via Jira?

On 09/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James

 Yes, I'm going to cut new RCs for 1.5 and 2.0.

 Thanks

Rory



 James Carman wrote:
 > On 3/8/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >
 >> I've taken into account the suggestions proposed by various people wrt
 >>  the TFTP server classes and accordingly made some changes. Thanks for
 >>  the feedback.
 >>
 >>
 >
 > So, does that mean you're cutting (or have already done so) a new
 > release candidate for us to vote on?
 >
 >
 >>  Rory
 >>
 >>
 >>  sebb wrote:
 >>  > On 07/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >>  >
 >>  >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >>  >>  > On 3/2/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >>  >>  >  > Hi
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a 
few
 >>  >>  >  >  issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a leap year date 
parsing bug.
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  The RC deployment is here:
 >>  >>  >  >  http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  Binaries:
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/commons-net-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  Source:
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/commons-net-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  Javadocs:
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/apidocs/index.html
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  SVN tag:
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0/
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >  >  Here's my +1 in advance.
 >>  >>  >  >  Cheers
 >>  >>  >  >  Rory
 >>  >>  >  >
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >  I just wanted to post my official -1 vote.  I feel that the
 >>  >>  >  org.apache.commons.net.tftp.TFTPServer class is outside the scope of
 >>  >>  >  Commons Net.  I have no problem with it being in the test classes, 
as
 >>  >>  >  suggested, though.
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >> Not a problem for me. +1 to including the server class.
 >>  >>
 >>  >>  It's not big codewise, and is not that far from Net's scope or Commons 
scope.
 >>  >>
 >>  >
 >>  > But it's not in scope (yet?)
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>  >>  Two proviso's:
 >>  >>
 >>  >>  1) The main method in TFTPServer should be removed.
 >>  >>
 >>  >
 >>  > +1
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>  >>  2) If we get lots of embedded server components, then we should
 >>  >>  rethink this, but I can see that the 'simple embedded server space' is
 >>  >>  pretty small. Might want to use a different package to allow it to
 >>  >>  more easily be split out.   org.apache.commons.net.server.* or
 >>  >>  something. Then people can send in their dumb EchoServer
 >>  >>  implementations :)
 >>  >>
 >>  >
 >>  > +1 to changing package name.
 >>  >
 >>  > I still think it should be in the test tree; AFAICS the purpose of the
 >>  > code contribution was to enable the TFTP Client to be tested.
 >>  >
 >>  > If Commons starts getting other simple server implementations then
 >>  > these ought to be part of a different project with a scope of
 >>  > Testing/Mocking or some such. Maybe not even in Commons.
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>  >>  Hen
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 >>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >
 >>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 >>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>  >
 >>
 >>
 >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >
 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >


 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to