The *nix short date formatting fixes don't currently have any tests,
at least when I last checked.

I think these need to be added first.

I can add some later today if that's OK with you?
Or do you want them done as patches via Jira?

On 09/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi James
>
>  Yes, I'm going to cut new RCs for 1.5 and 2.0.
>
>  Thanks
>
> Rory
>
>
>
>  James Carman wrote:
>  > On 3/8/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >> I've taken into account the suggestions proposed by various people wrt
>  >>  the TFTP server classes and accordingly made some changes. Thanks for
>  >>  the feedback.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  > So, does that mean you're cutting (or have already done so) a new
>  > release candidate for us to vote on?
>  >
>  >
>  >>  Rory
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  sebb wrote:
>  >>  > On 07/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >
>  >>  >> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>  >>  >>  > On 3/2/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >>  >  > Hi
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes 
> a few
>  >>  >>  >  >  issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a leap year date 
> parsing bug.
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  The RC deployment is here:
>  >>  >>  >  >  http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  Binaries:
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/commons-net-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  Source:
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/commons-net-1.5.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  Javadocs:
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/apidocs/index.html
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  SVN tag:
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0/
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >  >  Here's my +1 in advance.
>  >>  >>  >  >  Cheers
>  >>  >>  >  >  Rory
>  >>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  >  I just wanted to post my official -1 vote.  I feel that the
>  >>  >>  >  org.apache.commons.net.tftp.TFTPServer class is outside the scope 
> of
>  >>  >>  >  Commons Net.  I have no problem with it being in the test 
> classes, as
>  >>  >>  >  suggested, though.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >> Not a problem for me. +1 to including the server class.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  It's not big codewise, and is not that far from Net's scope or 
> Commons scope.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >
>  >>  > But it's not in scope (yet?)
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  Two proviso's:
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  1) The main method in TFTPServer should be removed.
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >
>  >>  > +1
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  2) If we get lots of embedded server components, then we should
>  >>  >>  rethink this, but I can see that the 'simple embedded server space' 
> is
>  >>  >>  pretty small. Might want to use a different package to allow it to
>  >>  >>  more easily be split out.   org.apache.commons.net.server.* or
>  >>  >>  something. Then people can send in their dumb EchoServer
>  >>  >>  implementations :)
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >
>  >>  > +1 to changing package name.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > I still think it should be in the test tree; AFAICS the purpose of the
>  >>  > code contribution was to enable the TFTP Client to be tested.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > If Commons starts getting other simple server implementations then
>  >>  > these ought to be part of a different project with a scope of
>  >>  > Testing/Mocking or some such. Maybe not even in Commons.
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >>  Hen
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >
>  >>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to