On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK but I still don't see much benefit - if I'm creating a release > candidate I have to zip up the artifacts and upload them to > p.a.o/~niallp so no big deal to include the site as well. My > preference is to keep it simple and I can't see me using this. I guess > its not a big deal to include it, but does anyone else think its a > good idea?
You're right. It's really not that big of a benefit. But, it does save at least one step (in a somewhat daunting process for the newbies like me). I wish we could just issue one command and have the site deployed where it's supposed to go and the distribution files built, signed, checksummed (is that a word?), and copied to where they're supposed to go. Now that would be automation! :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
