Niall Pemberton schrieb: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, James Carman >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > I would like to do a release of commons-parent mainly for the OSGi >> > > > (i.e. bundle) plugin and commons-build-plugin - the full set of >> > > > changes are here: >> > > > >> > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=630871&r2=611431&diff_format=h >> > > > >> > > > I know James had a couple of proposals (adding site deployment and >> > > > assembly plugin to "rc" profile) - but I'm not sure about them ATM >> > > > (adding the assembly plugin messes up anything that doesn't have an >> > > > assembly - e.g. commons-parent). >> > > >> > > Can we at least add in the deployment directory stuff for the site? >> > > The only problem with that is that you need to supply a property >> > > ("rcNumber") when you run in order for it to properly construct the >> > > URL. Does anyone know an easy way to grab the name of the SVN tag >> > > during the build so that we could use that? >> > >> > >> > How do you use this - something like "mvn site:stage"? >> >> Actually, it changes the default site deployment location. So, all >> you have to do is: >> >> mvn -Prc site:deploy >> >> >> > >> > Also does it give much benefit over just zipping up the site and >> > uploading manually? I can see us having to keep educating RM's that >> > they need to specify the "releaseManager" and "rc version" either on >> > the command line or in their settings.xml >> > >> >> We just need a nice document (currently in the works) that >> specifically spells out the exact steps (with maven/SVN commands). >> > > OK but I still don't see much benefit - if I'm creating a release > candidate I have to zip up the artifacts and upload them to > p.a.o/~niallp so no big deal to include the site as well. My > preference is to keep it simple and I can't see me using this. I guess > its not a big deal to include it, but does anyone else think its a > good idea? > Does anyone know what the very-recently-released maven-stage-plugin does? It's meant to be used for staging releases, but apart from that I haven't looked into it..
Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
