On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would like to do a release of commons-parent mainly for the OSGi > > > > (i.e. bundle) plugin and commons-build-plugin - the full set of > > > > changes are here: > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=630871&r2=611431&diff_format=h > > > > > > > > I know James had a couple of proposals (adding site deployment and > > > > assembly plugin to "rc" profile) - but I'm not sure about them ATM > > > > (adding the assembly plugin messes up anything that doesn't have an > > > > assembly - e.g. commons-parent). > > > > > > Can we at least add in the deployment directory stuff for the site? > > > The only problem with that is that you need to supply a property > > > ("rcNumber") when you run in order for it to properly construct the > > > URL. Does anyone know an easy way to grab the name of the SVN tag > > > during the build so that we could use that? > > > > > > How do you use this - something like "mvn site:stage"? > > Actually, it changes the default site deployment location. So, all > you have to do is: > > mvn -Prc site:deploy > > > > > > Also does it give much benefit over just zipping up the site and > > uploading manually? I can see us having to keep educating RM's that > > they need to specify the "releaseManager" and "rc version" either on > > the command line or in their settings.xml > > > > We just need a nice document (currently in the works) that > specifically spells out the exact steps (with maven/SVN commands).
OK but I still don't see much benefit - if I'm creating a release candidate I have to zip up the artifacts and upload them to p.a.o/~niallp so no big deal to include the site as well. My preference is to keep it simple and I can't see me using this. I guess its not a big deal to include it, but does anyone else think its a good idea? Niall > > > > Niall > > > > > > > > Also I only just noticed that the compiler plugin configuration > moved > > > > from the "build\plugins" section to > "build\plugins\pluginManagement" - > > > > not sure what the reason for that was, but I guess thats my lack of > > > > understanding > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=613456 > > > > > > > > I'll leave this at least a couple of days to see what kind of > > > > discussion evolves before starting a vote on commons-parent-8 > > > > > > > > Niall --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
