> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:19 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5 > > Simon Kitching wrote: > > ---- Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > >>> On Feb 4, 2008 8:47 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> From memory the preference was to move to a new package name - how > >>> about "org.apache.commons.io2"? > > To avoid confusion with version numbers, we could choose [io-two]: > > org.apache.commons.io-two > > > > org.apache.commons.nio ? :-) > > > > Seriously, commons.io2 seems better to me. These days, version numbers are > preceded by a dash in almost all cases, eg > > commons.io2-3.0.1 > > which looks ok to me. > > Just to be clear, I'm fine with org.apache.commons.io2. I just wanted to > throw io-two out as an idea.
Well, let's get codin'! Gary > > Stephen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
