On 19/01/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > The build works for me in all variants as expected (on JDK 1.6). The > only minor nit I have is that the Copyright in the Javadocs still looks > a bit wired (at least on my browser): Instead of the Copyright character > I only get a "?". >
Me too when I look at e.g.: http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-fileupload/site/apidocs/index.html or perhaps that was not regenerated? In the API docs generated by the Ant build, there is no Copyright footer at all. "maven dist" creates the Javadoc with OK Copyright symbols, but as mentioned before it fails before creating the archives. Not sure what M2 goal(s) correspond with M1 dist, but mvn package site:site assembly:assembly did seem to create the Javadocs with the correct copyright before failing with: [INFO] Unable to find information in class org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase referring back to nested class org.apache.co mmons.fileupload.FileUploadBase$1 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Trace net.sf.clirr.core.CheckerException: Unable to find information in class org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase referring back to nested class org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase$1 at net.sf.clirr.core.internal.bcel.BcelScopeHelper.getClassScope(BcelScopeHelper.java:127) at net.sf.clirr.core.internal.bcel.BcelJavaType.getDeclaredScope(BcelJavaType.java:141) at net.sf.clirr.core.internal.bcel.BcelJavaType.getEffectiveScope(BcelJavaType.java:145) at net.sf.clirr.core.Checker.runClassChecks(Checker.java:156) at net.sf.clirr.core.Checker.reportDiffs(Checker.java:136) at org.codehaus.mojo.clirr.AbstractClirrMojo.executeClirr(AbstractClirrMojo.java:227) at org.codehaus.mojo.clirr.ClirrReport.doReport(ClirrReport.java:249) <snip/> Presumably I used the wrong M2 goals. What goal(s) are needed to create the site and archives? > Oliver > > Jochen Wiedmann schrieb: > > Hi, > > > > I have prepared a release candidate 4 of commons-fileupload > > 1.2.1. The SVN tag is commons-fileupload-1.2.1rc4. A list of > > changes since rc3 and things that I haven't changes, > > can be found below. > > > > As usual, the proposed distributables can be found on > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-fileupload/dist > > > > The proposed site (unchanged since rc3) is on > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jochen/commons-fileupload/site > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jochen > > > > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] =0 > > [ ] -1 > > > > > > Changes since 1.2.1rc3: > > > > - Upgraded commons-parent to version 7. This means, in particular, > > that the maven-remote-resources-plugin is no longer used. > > - MD5 and SHA1 checksums now have the binary flag (*) > > - Fixed the copyright in the Javadoc bottom > > - Building with Ant and Java 1.3.1 works again. > > > > Other comments: > > > >> What does "(optional)" mean in the Dependencies section under Commons IO? > > > > It means optional. Commons-IO is required only, if you intend to use > > the DiskFileItem. > > > > > >> What commands are needed to build and test the code? > > > > The same than for most other commons projects: > > > > ant > > maven build > > mvn install > > > > Choose what you prefer. > > > >> I could not find the information on the site. > > > > May be. However, if that is the case, then it was the same for at > > least the previous two releases and it wasn't a blocking issue at the > > time. > > > >> Also, build.xml seems to be out of date, as it refers to junit 3.8.1. > > > > I don't think this is a problem. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
