On Jan 11, 2008 10:06 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 11, 2008 10:57 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Theres also the issue of specifying the "version" of the > > remote-resources-plugin - which in previous discussions people > > objected to. Please Note this is not configuring commons-parent to > > *use* that plugin - but just to specify the version number *if* a > > component does use it. I don't mind it going in and it has no impact > > unless components use it. Does anyone still have a problem with doing > > this? Also are there any other changes people think should be made > > before trying to release commons-parent-7? > > I have no particular problem with it, apart from the fact that I find > it pointless. > > If there is some code that actually uses the plugin, then that makes > sense. This code might be contained in some profile, in other words, > not used unless explicitly requested. But just to fix a version > number? What for?
Because Dennis wants it and if it causes no issues, then its one less thing to disagree on. Niall > Jochen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
