---- Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hello all: > > I am seeing two types of names in project.xml name elements. For a project > "Foo": > > - Foo > - Commons Foo > > Can we standardize one pattern for all [commons] projects? > > Current examples: > > Codec (SVN) > Commons Pool (SVN) > FileUpload (1.2.1 rc3) > IO (SVN) > Lang (SVN) > > Over the two, I would pick "Commons Foo". > > In project.xml there is no slot for a container project like "Commons". When > I build a list of projects based on the names, the missing "Commons" prefix > messes up the order. >
Making the name too short is also bad when using Continuum; the name is used in the web GUI display, and in the subject line of related automated emails. Just today there was an automated email to the myfaces list saying that project "Simple Example" failed to build. It was actually the Tobago Simple Example project that failed, but you needed to open the email and look at the svn url to discover that; the subject line was not sufficient. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
