On Nov 18, 2007 6:56 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/18/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 17, 2007 9:39 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 11/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Author: niallp
> > > > Date: Sat Nov 17 11:09:28 2007
> > > > New Revision: 595987
> > > >
> > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595987&view=rev
> > > > Log:
> > > > Add in Checkstyle, Cobertura (can't see JCoverage m2 plugin) and PMD 
> > > > reports
> > > >
> > > <snip/>
> > >
> > > A while ago, you pointed out the GPL aspect [1] of Cobertura reports.
> > > Along those lines, this may not be a good idea.
> > >
> > > Same comment also applies to ++revision.
> >
> > They're not being included in the distros currently and there doesn't
> > seem to be a JCoverage m2 plugin. I think the point is to get a proper
> > opinion on 1) Is it OK to distribute those as part of the docs and 2)
> > If it is, does it need something in the NOTICE file if they're
> > included in the distro? I guess no-one ever followed that up at Shale?
> >
> <snip/>
>
> Not that I'm aware of. We chose to remove them from v1.0.4.

I raised this on legal-discuss@ here: http://tinyurl.com/yoze93

Niall

> -Rahul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to