On 11/20/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 18, 2007 6:56 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/18/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2007 9:39 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > > > > > > > > A while ago, you pointed out the GPL aspect [1] of Cobertura reports. > > > > Along those lines, this may not be a good idea. > > > > > > > > Same comment also applies to ++revision. > > > > > > They're not being included in the distros currently and there doesn't > > > seem to be a JCoverage m2 plugin. I think the point is to get a proper > > > opinion on 1) Is it OK to distribute those as part of the docs and 2) > > > If it is, does it need something in the NOTICE file if they're > > > included in the distro? I guess no-one ever followed that up at Shale? > > > > > > > Not that I'm aware of. We chose to remove them from v1.0.4. > > I raised this on legal-discuss@ here: http://tinyurl.com/yoze93 > <snap/>
Thanks for taking time to follow up there. So then I'd say we should consider not using it for the site as well. As an aside, the previous release (v1.1 done via m1) contained the entire built site in the binary distro (I understand the m2 bin assembly you added doesn't do that). -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
