On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Doesn't that meant that we'll have to vote on the source and the packaged > rpms/debs otherwise they we have no official community standing. ? > I am not sure how we can give them official standing yet but we are the apache foundation, so we vote on source. I would say we vote on the packaging software from a different repo then the core+plugins and automatically update a repo from that one. The repo will not be endorsed but the way it is filled will be. my €0,02 of future dreams -----Original Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 27 November 2015 09:36 > To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Package Repositories > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > > > So. My understanding is that to make the packages in the repo 'official' > > they must be voted on. -- would we make the packages what we vote on, > > rather that the source code (bearing in mind you can't separate the > > packaging in that case). IMHO, it'll make testing a whole lot simpler > for > > folks if there is just no requirement to build from source. > > > > We will not stop voting on the source! Any vote on -, or otherwise > handling of packages is a separate thing. > -- Daan
