Well, in my non-coder opinion, we should not deliver broken software, however we saw in the past fixing it all delayed release considerably. Now, how broken is that VPC? :)
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilder Rodrigues" <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Friday, 6 November, 2015 08:57:56 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > I forgot to mention that for the failed rVPC test I followed the same steps > manually and it worked as expected. > > In addition, I would like to hear from the community what should we do in > terms > of minor/major bugs in new features (like the rVPC). Will those be fix and > added to a 4.6.1 or should it still be part of 4.6.0? > > Cheers, > Wilder > > On 06 Nov 2015, at 09:17, Wilder Rodrigues > <wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > My considerations after the tests agains XenServer 6.2: > > We got 4 failures whilst testing against Xen62: > > * test_vpc_redundant.py on line 522 > - AssertionError: No Master or too many master routers found 0 > * test_internal_lb.py lines 712 and 576, when trying to deploy a virtual > machine > - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-36-89-VM] > - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-36-91-VM] > * test_vpc_vpn.py line 604 for the same reason as above > - Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-37-95-VM] > > There are bugs in the test_vpc_vpn.py VPN test: in case of failures, when we > reach either line 604 or 624, it will try to assert the state of the variable > vm1/vm2, but is has not been assigned yet, which makes us face an Unbound > Error: > - UnboundLocalError: local variable 'vm1' referenced before assignment > > Looking at the code I noticed that the same will happen for vm2, in case vm1 > deployment passes but vm1 doesn’t. > > Concerning the LB and VPN tests, those failed due to a wrong template. Those > tests should be executed against KVM only as they have a configuration which > depends on KVM hypervisors > > ``` > "default_hypervisor": "kvm", > "compute_offering": { > "name": "Tiny Instance", > "displaytext": "Tiny Instance", > "cpunumber": 1, > "cpuspeed": 100, > "memory": 128, > } > ``` > > But I will change that. > > Concerning the redundant VPC test that failed, it was due an absence of a > master > router. For some reason, after the self.delete_nat_rules() was called, the > router switched from Master to Backup, which caused the error. I will > investigate. > > There was also a problem reported by Boris concerning the DEB packages, which > he > already has a PR for ==> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040. This > is package related, thus I don’t see it as a blocker for the release, hence my > +1. > > > ::: Full Report ::: > > > :: Environment 1 :: > > * Hardware required: TRUE > * Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1 > * Two XenServer 6.2 hosts > > > :: Tests Suites Executed :: > > nosetests --with-marvin > --marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zone1-xen1-ISOLATED.cfg -s -a > tags=advanced,required_hardware=true component/test_vpc_redundant.py > component/test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py > component/test_routers_network_ops.py component/test_vpc_router_nics.py > component/test_password_server.py component/test_router_dhcphosts.py > smoke/test_loadbalance.py smoke/test_internal_lb.py smoke/test_ssvm.py > smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py smoke/test_network.py > > :: Environment 2 :: > > * Hardware required: FALSE > * Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1 > * Two XenServer 6.2 hosts > > > :: Tests Suites Executed :: > > nosetests --with-marvin > --marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zone1-xen1-ISOLATED.cfg -s -a > tags=advanced,required_hardware=false smoke/test_routers.py > smoke/test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py smoke/test_vm_life_cycle.py > component/test_vpc_routers.py smoke/test_service_offerings.py > component/test_vpc_offerings.py smoke/test_network_acl.py > smoke/test_privategw_acl.py smoke/test_network.py > > > :: Summary :: > > * Tests executes: 75 > * Successfull tests: 72 > * Skipped tests: 6(*) > * Failed tests: 5(**) > > (*) Tests were skipped because I had 2 hosts and the current logic in the > tests > does not cope with that: it lists the hosts and takes the one in index zero > - host = hosts[0] > (**) Failures and Exceptions being taken into counted > > :: Test results for Environment 1 :: > > > Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network ... === > TestName: test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Status : > FAILED === > FAIL > Create a redundant VPC with two networks with two VMs in each network and > check > default routes ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to > check router services > Test iptables default INPUT/FORWARD policy on RouterVM ... === TestName: > test_02_routervm_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test iptables default INPUT/FORWARD policies on VPC router ... === TestName: > test_01_single_VPC_iptables_policies | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test redundant router internals ... === TestName: > test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Create a VPC with two networks with one VM in each network and test nics after > destroy ... === TestName: test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Create a VPC with two networks with one VM in each network and test default > routes ... === TestName: test_02_VPC_default_routes | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Check the password file in the Router VM ... === TestName: > test_isolate_network_password_server | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Check that the /etc/dhcphosts.txt doesn't contain duplicate IPs ... === > TestName: test_router_dhcphosts | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to create Load balancing rule with source NAT ... === TestName: > test_01_create_lb_rule_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to create Load balancing rule with non source NAT ... === TestName: > test_02_create_lb_rule_non_nat | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for assign & removing load balancing rule ... === TestName: > test_assign_and_removal_lb | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to verify access to loadbalancer haproxy admin stats page ... === > TestName: > test02_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Status : EXCEPTION === > ERROR > Test create, assign, remove of an Internal LB with roundrobin http traffic to > 3 > vm's ... === TestName: test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | > Status : EXCEPTION === > ERROR > Test SSVM Internals ... === TestName: test_03_ssvm_internals | Status : > SUCCESS > === > ok > Test CPVM Internals ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host > credentials to check router services > Test stop SSVM ... === TestName: test_05_stop_ssvm | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test stop CPVM ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host > credentials to check router services > Test reboot SSVM ... === TestName: test_07_reboot_ssvm | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test reboot CPVM ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host > credentials to check router services > Test destroy SSVM ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host > credentials to check router services > Test destroy CPVM ... === TestName: test_10_destroy_cpvm | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test Remote Access VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_remote_access_vpn | > Status : FAILED === > FAIL > Test VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : EXCEPTION > === > ERROR > Test for port forwarding on source NAT ... === TestName: > test_01_port_fwd_on_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for port forwarding on non source NAT ... === TestName: > test_02_port_fwd_on_non_src_nat | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for reboot router ... === TestName: test_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired public IP ... === > TestName: > test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired public IP ... === > TestName: > test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for Router rules for network rules on acquired public IP ... === > TestName: > test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 33 tests in 9352.773s > > FAILED (SKIP=5, errors=3, failures=2) > (END) > > > :: Test results for Environment 2 :: > > Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host > credentials to check router services > Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | > Status > : SUCCESS === > ok > Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status > : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: > test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter > | > Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : > SUCCESS > === > ok > Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: > test_deploy_vm_multiple | > Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : > SUCCESS > === > ok > Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test migrate VM ... === TestName: test_08_migrate_vm | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | > Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test start/stop of router after addition of one guest network ... === > TestName: > test_01_start_stop_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test reboot of router after addition of one guest network ... === TestName: > test_02_reboot_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test to change service offering of router after addition of one guest network > ... === TestName: > test_04_chg_srv_off_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test destroy of router after addition of one guest network ... === TestName: > test_05_destroy_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : SUCCESS > === > ok > Test to stop and start router after creation of VPC ... === TestName: > test_01_stop_start_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to reboot the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: > test_02_reboot_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Tests to change service offering of the Router after ... === TestName: > test_04_change_service_offerring_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to destroy the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: > test_05_destroy_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to create service offering ... === TestName: > test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to update existing service offering ... === TestName: > test_02_edit_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test to delete service offering ... === TestName: > test_03_delete_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test create VPC offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_vpc_offering | > Status > : SUCCESS === > ok > Test VPC offering without load balancing service ... === TestName: > test_03_vpc_off_without_lb | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test VPC offering without static NAT service ... === TestName: > test_04_vpc_off_without_static_nat | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test VPC offering without port forwarding service ... === TestName: > test_05_vpc_off_without_pf | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test VPC offering with invalid services ... === TestName: > test_06_vpc_off_invalid_services | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test update VPC offering ... === TestName: test_07_update_vpc_off | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > Test list VPC offering ... === TestName: test_08_list_vpc_off | Status : > SUCCESS > === > ok > test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering > (integration.component.test_vpc_offerings.TestVPCOffering) ... === TestName: > test_09_create_redundant_vpc_offering | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > test_privategw_acl (integration.smoke.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... > === TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for delete account ... === TestName: test_delete_account | Status : > SUCCESS > === > ok > Test for Associate/Disassociate public IP address for admin account ... === > TestName: test_public_ip_admin_account | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for Associate/Disassociate public IP address for user account ... === > TestName: test_public_ip_user_account | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > Test for release public IP address ... === TestName: test_releaseIP | Status : > SUCCESS === > ok > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 42 tests in 5463.487s > > OK (SKIP=1) > (END) > > > On 05 Nov 2015, at 20:13, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> wrote: > > Installation on CentOS 6 mgmt and HVs worked great, added some templates, > deployed some instances, no issues. > I'll get back if I hit problems. > > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro/> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 08:48:38 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > Thanks Remi! > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Remi Bergsma" > <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 20:45:59 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > Kicked off some Jenkins builds: > > CentOS 6 packages: > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm-packages-with-branch-parameter/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ > > CentOS 7 packages: > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm-packages-with-branch-parameter-centos7/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Ubuntu Trusty packages: > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.6/pool/ > > SystemVM template: > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterized-sytemvm/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/ > > > You can always build packages from the source: > cd packaging > ./package.sh -h > > Happy testing! > > Regards, > Remi > > > > > > On 04/11/15 18:12, "Remi Bergsma" > <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > > The jobs failed due to the git clone failing (time out). I also experience it > is > quite slow at the moment. > > It is mirrored here (same commit id): > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 > > Regards, > Remi > > > > > On 04/11/15 17:17, "Rajani Karuturi" > <rajani.karut...@citrix.com<mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com>> wrote: > > I started jenkins builds for cloudstack RPM packages and systemvm templates > for > this branch here > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/cloudstack-rpm-packages-with-branch-parameter/19/console > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/parameterized/job/parameterized-sytemvm/3/console > > We can use them once the build is complete. > > ~Rajani > > On 04-Nov-2015, at 8:58 PM, Nux! > <n...@li.nux.ro<mailto:n...@li.nux.ro><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Has jenkins built rpms for this somewhere? > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro><http://www.nux.ro> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Remi Bergsma" > <rberg...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 4 November, 2015 14:55:11 > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0 > > Hi all, > > I've created a 4.6.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.6.0-RC20151104T1522 > > Commit: b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.6.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using A47DDC4F): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
