Daan So what is the final status on CLOUDSTACK-6069? I will respin another RC and looks like Kishan/Murali cannot reproduce it
Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:09 AM > To: Kishan Kavala; Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > > Yes it does, > > Two guest networks both tagged. system net offer isn't tagged. that's why it > is strange it used to work. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] > Sent: donderdag 13 februari 2014 11:59 > To: Daan Hoogland; Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > > Daan, > I couldn't repo CLOUDSTACK-6069 in my regular VPC setup. Does this > happen only when using mixed setup with Nicira? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] > > Sent: Thursday, 13 February 2014 2:29 PM > > To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; daan Hoogland > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > > > > I can confirm that it also exists in master. Unfortunately it is not > > high on my prio list right now. We have a pressing bug hurting us in > > our production systems that I will get out of the way first. > > > > What I can say is that I am puzzled that my test works in 4.2 and > > before as I instantiate a private gateway with associated network, > > while the system network offering for private gateways has no tags and > > I have two guest networks. > > > > I will return to this issue when given time. > > > > Regards, > > Daan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > > Sent: woensdag 12 februari 2014 11:52 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: Kishan Kavala; Murali Reddy; Daan Hoogland; daan Hoogland > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > > > > Adding Murali as well. > > > > Daan I am not sure if there was any specific work done on this during > > 4.3 to cause it to regress. Did you debug this further? > > > > Thanks > > Animesh > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:42 AM > > > To: dev > > > Cc: Kishan Kavala > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6069 > > > > > > I will try in master as well. And look for a solution there. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > > > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > Daan > > > > > > > > Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for > > > > his input > > > > > > > > Animesh > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > > > >> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM > > > >> To: dev > > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round) > > > >> > > > >> H, > > > >> > > > >> -1 (binding) > > > >> > > > >> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn > > > >> out to be a setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my > setup. > > > >> I have four basic test cases|: > > > >> 1. create network and vm on top - works 2. create bridged network > > > >> and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with private gateway > > > >> (and > > > >> ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private gateway - > > > >> works > > > >> > > > >> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was > > > >> always giving me the most problems. The others worked on the > previous rc. > > > >> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using > > > >> 4.3 if it passes but it needs fixing asap. > > > >> > > > >> setup > > > >> 1 zone > > > >> 1 pod > > > >> 1 cluster > > > >> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2) > > > >> > > > >> 2 physnets > > > >> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"), > > > >> Management, > > > >> Storage) > > > >> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based")) > > > >> > > > >> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a > > > >> 530 server error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority > > > >> vote. One of the things that makes me hesitate is > > > >> 4.2.1 code (succeeding): > > > >> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] > > > >> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on > > > >> device > > > >> tunnel0 > > > >> 4.3.0 code (failing) > > > >> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] > > > >> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host > > > >> 10.200.23.42 on device tunnel0 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > > > >> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Hi All, > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up > > > >> >>> for a > > > >> >>> vote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, > > > >> >> +KVM, > > > >> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065 > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > >> > > > > >> > Nux! > > > >> > www.nux.ro > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Daan > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Daan
