Daan

Can you create a tracking bug for this issue? Adding Kishan for his input

Animesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 10:25 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fourth round)
> 
> H,
> 
> -1 (binding)
> 
> I have a backwards compatibility issue with 4.3. It might turn out to be a
> setup thing but I have verified that 4.2.1 works with my setup.
> I have four basic test cases|:
> 1. create network and vm on top - works
> 2. create bridged network and create vm on it - works 3. create a vpc with
> private gateway (and ...) - fails 4. create a vpc with nicira based private
> gateway - works
> 
> I haven't actually tried 1,2 and 4 on this rc because 3 was always giving me
> the most problems. The others worked on the previous rc.
> Having discussed this with Hugo, we'll probably not stop using 4.3 if it 
> passes
> but it needs fixing asap.
> 
> setup
> 1 zone
> 1 pod
> 1 cluster
> 2 hosts (xen 6.0.2)
> 
> 2 physnets
> - physnet 1 vlan based (Public, Guest(tagged "vlan-based"), Management,
> Storage)
> - physnet 2 nicira based (Guest (tagged "nicira-based"))
> 
> Now creating a private gateway on the vpc using marvin I get a 530 server
> error. I dare to put a -1 here as it is a majority vote. One of the things 
> that
> makes me hesitate is
> 4.2.1 code (succeeding):
> 2014-02-10 15:43:45,621 DEBUG [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
> (DirectAgent-4:null) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.41 on device
> tunnel0
> 4.3.0 code (failing)
> 2014-02-10 17:33:51,083 DEBUG [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase]
> (DirectAgent-4:ctx-6d5f0cd4) Creating VLAN 322 on host 10.200.23.42 on
> device tunnel0
> 
> 
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> > On 08.02.2014 10:56, Nux! wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> >>> vote:
> >>
> >>
> >> +1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
> >> NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
> >
> >
> > There might be a problem with the HA engine, please see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6065
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Daan

Reply via email to