> On Sept. 30, 2013, 6:12 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > utils/src/com/cloud/utils/backoff/impl/ConstantTimeBackoff.java, line 60 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/14405/diff/1/?file=359645#file359645line60> > > > > I wouldn't log at WARN level for this, can you change to DEBUG. > > Hitting that catch block is expected as part of the wakeup behavior
Can we agree in an INFO level log? It seems it is not a usual flow of events, but caused by administrator interaction through a JMX (see ConstantTimeBackoffMBean) - Laszlo ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14405/#review26503 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 30, 2013, 5:39 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/14405/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 30, 2013, 5:39 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack. > > > Repository: cloudstack-git > > > Description > ------- > > - javadoc changed - the old one was copy-pasted from AgentShell > - start and stop method removed - they did the same as the overridden methods > - _counter removed as it was only written, but never read > - remove from _asleep map was moved to a finally block, to make sure it is > removed even in case of the thread gets interrupted > - Tests created for the above scenarios. > > > Diffs > ----- > > agent/src/com/cloud/agent/AgentShell.java bf1e818 > utils/src/com/cloud/utils/backoff/impl/ConstantTimeBackoff.java 976e369 > utils/test/com/cloud/utils/backoff/impl/ConstantTimeBackoffTest.java > PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14405/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > test included > > > Thanks, > > Laszlo Hornyak > >
